The Paradox of Revenge in Edgar Allan Poes The Cask of Amontillado Ess

The Paradox of Revenge in Edgar Allan Poes The Cask of Amontillado?The Cask of Amontillado? raises a unbelief pertaining to the multiple character of the egotism (Davidson 202) Can harmony of ones self be restored once primal impulses have been acted upon? This question proposes the fantasy of crime without offspring (Stepp 60). Edgar Allan Poe uses first person point of view, vivid symbolism and situational irony to say that because of mans inner self, revenge is ultimately non possible. Edward Davidson suggests that Montresor, the main character of the story, has the force-out of moving downward from his mind or keen being and into his brute(prenominal) or physical self and then return again to his intellectual being with his total self being unimpaired (202). However, Poe tells this story from Montresor?s point of view. The use of first person narration provides the reader with taste into Montresors inner struggles. First person narration is Poes method of insuring the re ader understands that Montresor is not successful at this harmony. The thoughts and feelings of Montresor lead the reader to conclude that he is not successful at revenge. Montresor says in telling his story, You, who so well whop the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however that I gave utterance to a threat (153). By communicating in this way, the question arises of who Montresor is actually speech production to, and why he is telling this story fifty years later. atomic number 53 can only conclude that it is for one of two reasons he is each bragging or finally giving confession. As he tells the story, it becomes writ large that he has not yet filled his need to win, and now a half of a century later, is still struggling with his conscience. As Gregory Jay s... ...onscious self is obsessed with an evil, the conscious must overcome it or a riddle will result in which both selves parish. Works CitedBarbour, Brian. Poe and Tradition. eyeshade 63-81.Bloom, Harold. Interpret ations The Tales of Poe. red-hot York Chelsea House, 1987.Davidson, Edward H. Poe A Critical Study. Cambridge Harvard UP, 1980.Frieden, Ken. Poes Narrative Monologues. Bloom 135-48.Gargano, James. The Question of Poes Narrators. Regan 164-71.Jay, Gregory. Poe Writing and the Unconscious. Bloom 83-110.Poe, Edgar Allan. The Cask of Amontillado. Literature for Composition. Sylvan Barnet, et al, eds. 4th ed. New York HarperCollins, 1996. 153-57.Regan, Robert. Poe A allurement of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs Prentice-Hall, 1967.Stepp, Walter. The Ironic Double in Poes The Cask of Amontillado Bloom 55-62.